Some firms cannot put their deal flow on someone else's infrastructure — because of what they signed, who they answer to, or what sits next to it. DEALITHIC deploys into your own cloud account instead, or gets rebuilt around how your firm actually underwrites.
Every shape runs the identical underwriting engine. What changes is where it sits and how much of it is yours.
The platform as everyone else runs it, on our infrastructure. Nothing to install, nothing to review, working this afternoon. If your data can live with a vendor, stop here — this is the cheapest and fastest answer, and most firms should take it.
DEALITHIC runs inside your own AWS or Azure account. Your documents, your deal records and your mandate logic stay in infrastructure you already own and already audit — and model calls route to Claude on Bedrock in your account, so inference is billed to you and never transits ours.
The engine, rebuilt around how your firm actually underwrites — your screening criteria, your memo format, your object model, under your own brand. This is a build engagement rather than a subscription, and it is scoped before anyone quotes it.
Every inbound deal scored against the criteria your firm actually uses, rather than a generic rubric — with the reasoning attached to each verdict.
CIMs, decks and financials read and structured, then underwritten into a memo with the model chosen by the shape of the cash flows, not by asset-class habit.
Most firms keep a careful record of what they bought. Almost none keep one of what they declined, or why — and that is the record that answers an LP, a committee or your own team eighteen months later.
Matching across the fund universe on thesis, stage, sector, geography and check size, run inside your deployment rather than against a shared index.
If your team already runs Claude against your own systems, our tools attach to that setup over MCP. Your engineers keep the assistant they designed and the access rules they wrote — they simply gain underwriting as a set of tools it can call.
That is deliberately not a plugin for your CRM. A vendor package inside your object model is a migration; a tool your assistant can call is an afternoon.
If hosted works for you, take hosted. It is live today, it costs a fraction of a deployment, and it runs the same engine. Enterprise exists for the firms that genuinely cannot use it — not as an upgrade path for the ones that can.
A written questionnaire covering data residency, existing systems, deal intake, mandate documentation and your own vendor-review process. It goes to the right person on your side for each section rather than landing entirely on one desk.
A written scope built from those answers — what runs where, what integrates, what is explicitly out. Priced once, after the scope is agreed. We do not quote before we know what the answers are.
Deployment into your environment, mandate encoding, integration work and acceptance testing. Your security onboarding runs in parallel and is usually the long pole — it belongs in the schedule from day one, not as a surprise in week six.
A named support route with agreed response times. On your infrastructure a fix is a release rather than a hot patch, so the support model is part of the scope rather than an afterthought.
Installing working systems into environments somebody else controls has been standing practice here since 2018, through ConnectATD — a custom AI practice that builds automation, internal agents and business-intelligence layers into other companies' operations rather than selling them software off a shelf.
The same engineer who writes the platform runs the deployment. There is no handover to an implementation partner who has never seen the inside of it. Meet the team →
Every deployment is scoped before it is quoted, so there is no price list here. The first step is a conversation about your data, your existing systems and your review process.
Want to see the product first? The walkthrough needs no deployment and no procurement.